![gay snapchat sexting foru gay snapchat sexting foru](https://static.tommys-bookmarks.com/data/toplinks/526/screenshot.jpg)
If they don't want a message to hang around, they'll use a temporary app such as Snapchat. Instead of using only one way to send messages, teens (and adults) are using lots of different apps to share a secret here, stalk a crush there, or post a selfie anywhere.ĭepending on what they want to say and to whom, teens choose the app that best fits their needs. Their next court date is in March.When people say, "There's an app for that," they're not kidding - especially when it comes to connecting with others. He found both the mother and the father guilty of assault. The judge also found the use of weapons - "namely the plastic mini hockey stick and the skipping rope" - was not reasonable under the circumstances and amounted to excessive corporal punishment. In my view, the actions of the parents were also degrading." "Their actions were solely punitive and not corrective. "The parents took no educative or corrective steps by seeking out expert help or any other assistance," de Walle wrote. In the case at hand, de Walle found the father had clearly intended the spanking as punishment for sexting. The law generally accepts that those rules don't apply to corporal punishment used on children under two or teenagers.
![gay snapchat sexting foru gay snapchat sexting foru](https://static.tommys-bookmarks.com/data/toplinks/525/screenshot.jpg)
"Although the complainant chose a 'spanking,' it was not a fully informed consent with an appreciation of all the consequences," de Walle wrote.Īs far as discipline is concerned, the Supreme Court has set out considerations whereby "corrective force" is deemed reasonable as opposed to assault: It must be intended for educative or corrective purposes, and the force has to be reasonable under the circumstances. The judge found that the parents were in a position of authority, and she wasn't offered a choice beyond grounding or assault. Legal arguments in the case centred on a child's ability to consent to an assault from a parent and the consideration that goes into "corrective force" used by parents as discipline. "In other words, the father believes that an object, not the hand, must be used when administering discipline." "He testified that the hand is used for compassion and love, not for discipline," de Walle wrote. On the stand, the father, who had no criminal record, described his family as Christian. His father used to discipline him with an orange plastic spoon. The mother said she was doing this because she loved her daughter." The hand is for love, not discipline "She hit her daughter two or three times on her buttocks with the skipping rope.
![gay snapchat sexting foru gay snapchat sexting foru](https://queerty-prodweb.s3.amazonaws.com/2018/04/snapchat-2-492x670.jpg)
"The mother became upset and picked up a skipping rope that was in the garage," the decision says. He then discussed what form of punishment would be appropriate. "The daughter subsequently recalled that her father offered her two options: to be grounded for a really long time or to be spanked."Īccording to the decision, the father struck his daughter two or three times with a plastic mini hockey stick about 45 centimetres in length. The father confronted the daughter and told her "she needed to respect herself and not throw herself at boys." "The daughter believed that the photos only lasted a few seconds after transmission using the Snapchat site." "On reviewing the text messages on the iPad the father discovered messages that referred to his daughter sending nude photographs of herself," de Walle wrote. The Supreme Court has ruled that children between the age of two and under the age of 13 can be spanked if the action is seen as corrective and reasonable. It came to the attention of police when the daughter showed bruises on her buttocks to two of her girlfriends, who in turn reported what they had seen to the school principal.Īccording to de Walle's ruling, the father had previously confiscated the daughter's cellphone because of her renewed relationship with the boyfriend. The incident occurred in 2015 on Valentine's Day. "To suggest that responding to such acts by a teenaged daughter (14 going on 15 years), by spanking her with an object, would be educative or corrective, is simply not believable or acceptable by any measure of current social consensus." 2 options: grounding or spanking Such behaviours can lead to bullying and even suicide," de Walle wrote. The pitfalls and dangers of such activities are well-reported. "In this day and age, any reasonable parent would be concerned about a teenager sending nude pictures of him or herself via a cellphone or any other electronic device.